HOW TO DEVELOP RESEARCH GAP (ANALYSIS) FROM LITERATURE REVIEWS
Seeing the invisible - While all research is, to some extent, useful, we’ve seen a lot of research that does not have the expected impact. That means wasted time, wasted money, under-served clients, and frustration on multiple levels. A big part of that problem is that directions for research are often chosen intuitively; in a sort of improvised process. While the intuition of experts is deeply respected , that kind of process is not very accurate. This post aims to help you identify the missing pieces in any study, literature review, or program analysis so that you are able to better target your research in a more cost-effective way to fill those knowledge gaps to develop more effective theories, plans, and evaluations (via a link :)) There are really three basic kinds of gaps for you to find: relevance/meaning, logic/structure, and data/evidence. Happy reading the below link! Source (Please take your time to read this article) : https://www.resear...